This is a long long overdue post… Having the HASTAC and ASA conferences back-to-back weekends this year was more than a little chaotic, but it also meant that I had a chance to be part of a series of thoughtful, engaged conversations with people working on amazing and varied projects- on technology, critical university studies, feminist pedagogy, race and the digital humanities, and more. Even now, over a month after both conferences, I find myself returning to the threads of those conversations to think through how I might integrate the ideas and practices I learned from attending panels and speaking to other faculty and students into my scholarly work.
For the time being, this post will be about HASTAC 2017, not least because it was my first time attending and also the first time I’ve ever been to a conference that welcomed such a range of experimental panels. You would think because I’d been in bi-weekly virtual meetings with the local organizers in Orlando, Bruce Janz and Amy Giroux, for months in advance that I would have a better sense of what to anticipate, but I really didn’t… This just goes to show that for all of the things the digital enables, it cannot capture the feeling of what it means to be together in a shared space, in real-time.
I could not imagine what the HASTAC Scholars UnConference, spearheaded by Futures Initiative Fellow, Kalle Westerling, would look like, the energy the students would bring into the room over lively and intense talks about managing multiple social media profiles, blogging, Twitter, and the demands and anxieties around professionalization. I could not imagine a more inspirational opening plenary where topics from empowering students and local communities and doing justice through the archives we curate, to Afrofuturism and redistributing resources to the global south were discussed. I could not imagine the kinds of conversations that spilled over from panels into casual conversations- about the ethics of citation, the challenges and possibilities of collaborative research and writing, the importance of peer mentorship and community, how digital technologies can be used to make information more accessible, and so on and on. And, while I wasn’t physically in the room for Cathy N. Davidson’s keynote conversation with Julie Thompson Klein (due to an unfortunate misreading of the conference schedule on my part), I followed the lively Twitter feed and heard from so many people afterwards how important and necessary this dialogue on The New Education and its possible worlds was–and is–for our times.
Read the full post on HASTAC.
P.S. If you’re looking for more on the impact of #HASTAC17, check out this post written by Cherishe Cumma, a Leadership Liaison in our CUNY Undergraduate Leadership Program, on her experiences at the conference.